Ali naj blogerji popravijo svoje napake?

Depositphotos 13825258 s

There’s a great discussion on Nesramni Geeks that rolled over to TWIT this week that’s near and dear to me with my respect for journalists. Bloggers are not journalists in the traditional sense of the word but we so novinarji, če jih gledamo z vidika potrošnikov.

Corrections are important and should be dealt with, but it depends on the mistake that’s been made.

Old posts are still ‘alive’ in search engine results and there are comments associated (often) with the information discussed. Dvorak thinks it’s crazy to go back and make edits to old posts… he believes it’s spilled milk and because no one usually reads it, it’s over and done and the user should move on. Leo discusses that he’s compelled to correct the post, especially if any comments may appear to be disassociated with the edit after it’s made. I agree with Leo!

  • Pripis – if I miss attributing an image, quote, article, etc. I will immediately make the necessary edits regardless of the age of the post. It’s essential (if not legally compelling) that we ensure we provide credit where credit is due.
  • Napake, na katere opozarjajo komentarji – when a reader of my blog finds an error in the post, I will usually correct the error and respond via comments that it’s been both corrected and how much I appreciate the information they’ve provided. This provides a written record of the change as well as shows readers that I’m not only human, but I care about how accurate my information is.
  • Napake, ki jih najdem - Za oznako napake in popravek bom uporabil stavkovno oznako v HTML-ju. Oznaka stavke je enostavna za uporabo.
    Besede za stavko

    Again, this is regardless of the age of the post. I want my posts to be accurate, and want readers to see when I’ve made an error and corrected it. It’s all about credibility – and admitting your mistakes has value.

  • Slovnica in pravopis – When I actually do figure out that I’ve made a grammatical error (usually someone else has to tell me), I will make the edit and I don’t disclose it. Since this doesn’t change the accuracy of a blog post, I don’t feel the need to disclose how terrible I am at grammar and spelling. After all, my regular readers already realize this!

I correct every mistake that I find or that my readers point out to me. You should, too! Unlike a print journalist, we have advanced abilities in online editing that don’t require us to ‘republish’ a post.

I don’t ever believe it’s necessary to push a note in a later blog post describing the edit to a previous post (as John markoff predlagano v oddaji Cranky Geeks!), je blogging bolj pogovorni in pretočni slog komunikacije. Bralci bodo sprejemali napake ... razen, če bodo popolnoma odpravljeni.

It’s about credibility, authority, and accuracy that I make it a habit to correct my blog’s errors. A blog doesn’t have any power unless the readers believe the information that is there and reference it. I believe that if you ignore correcting your mistakes, your credibility will falter – as will the number of readers you have and the number of sites that reference yours.

11 Komentarji

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 6

    Douglas: Strinjam se s stvarnimi napakami. Če jih zapustite, boste bodočim bralcem morda resno škodovali. OTOH, če zavzamete položaj mila in vas na njej pokličejo na preprogo, mislim, da je prepisovanje zgodovine nesmiselno. JMTCW vseeno.

  5. 7

    Moj glavni hišni ljubljenec za napake v blogu je osredotočen na slovnične napake - samo očesne očesce mi na primer očisti, da vidim prikaz vtičnika WWSGD:

    Če je vaš novi tukaj, si oglejte moj vir!

    ARGH! 'to seveda ni pomembno za stare objave, vendar je prva stvar, ki mi je padla na pamet.

    Po potrebi bom vedno popravljal svoje objave - to je del odgovornosti odgovornega blogerja.

    Srečna nedelja, Barbara

    • 8

      Hvala Barbara! Upam, da boste lahko potrpeli (in opozorili) na moje slovnične napake.

      Zdi se mi, da jih prepoznam šele potem, ko jih nekdo, kot ste vi, ujame in mi sporoči. Vedno sem v zadregi, ker oba vem bolje in sem se izobraževala - to je samo moja napaka.

      S skrbnostjo, prakso in preverjanjem sem znatno zmanjšal število napak. To je eden od razlogov, zaradi katerih se prisilim pisati vsak dan!

  6. 9
    • 10

      Živjo Patric,

      Odlično vprašanje in v celoti bom priznal, da sem tudi v komentarjih popravil pravopisne in slovnične napake! Čeprav je "uporabniško ustvarjen", je še vedno vsebina na mojem blogu. Kot tak ima enako vrednost in dobi enako pozornost. Vendar ne delam ničesar, kar bi spremenilo prvotno temo sporočila!

      Doug

  7. 11

    Če gre za slovnično ali pravopisno napako - kot da bi kdaj kaj od tega imel! - Popravil bom, ne da bi na to opozoril.

    Če pa gre za vsebinsko napako, mislim, da jo je treba popraviti. Vnos v spletni dnevnik je neke vrste zgodovinski zapis. To ni časopis, ki se prebere in nato zavrže. Napake se ne smejo odpraviti v samostojnem vnosu. Spletni dnevniki, tako kot ves internet, so trajni in jih je treba popraviti tako, da stojijo.

    Kako jih bodo popravili, je odvisno od posameznega blogerja. Osebno bom odpravil napako in če je dovolj velika, poudarim, da sem jo odpravil. Če gre za majhno stvar, na primer za napačno mesto, jo bom odpravil brez obvestila.

Kaj menite?

Ta stran uporablja Akismet za zmanjšanje nezaželene pošte. Preberite, kako se vaš komentar obravnava.